STARTERS

Item number one is too important today.
The starters are at the end.

----:::----

PERFECT FOR EASTER

https://www.gunlaws.com/books4.htm
 
Only $6.95, a deeply religious view of firearms,
click the image to read about the proposed
"Patron Saint of Handgunning."






1- Iran Tweets in English: "Israel Must Be Annihilated"

Media fails to cover THAT part of Netanyahu's speech


The "secret" treaty Obama/Kerry want won't stop an Iranian nuke
Netanyahu spells it out -- THAT'S why they hated his appearance



The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gave a highly controversial speech before Congress on March 3, 2015. Many democrats boycotted the speech, people in Israel thought it was a political stunt, and the president made a big deal out of deciding not to watch it. Mr. Obama and Mr. Netanyahu do not get along.



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

The crucial parts of Netanyahu's speech were in the beginning.

These were excluded from most U.S. "news" reports, but having watched the whole thing live I heard it. My jaw dropped. A simple web search provides anyone with the transcript.

You heard about the controversy, the fact that the man currently in the White House turned his back on the speech -- from our greatest ally in the Middle East! isolated among endless murderous muslim maniacs in the region.

Here's what the "news" didn't give you -- the news. FACTS about the blood thirsty madmen seeking atom bombs, literally being aided and abetted by our own president and secretary of state -- unimaginably impeachable offenses. These are not minor glitches or problems. These are full-fledged nightmares.

Netanyahu shed light: "Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei spews the oldest hatred, the oldest hatred of anti-Semitism with the newest technology. He tweets that Israel must be annihilated -- he tweets! You know, in Iran, there isn't exactly free Internet. But he tweets in English that Israel must be destroyed."

Have you seen that in the "news"? No of course not. It would upset their narrative. We need a man to come here from the other side of the world to say it, so the man in the White House can turn his back -- and our media can decide it's not important enough to repeat.

He continues: "For those who believe that Iran threatens the Jewish state, but not the Jewish people, listen to Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, Iran's chief terrorist proxy. He said: 'If all the Jews gather in Israel, it will save us the trouble of chasing them down around the world.'"

I am not making this up. Neither is Netanyahu. Have you seen that in the "news"? No of course not. It would upset their narrative of "controversy." We need a man to come here from the other side of the world to say it, so the person in the White House can turn his back and our media can decide not to dwell on it.

"But Iran's regime is not merely a Jewish problem, any more than the Nazi regime was merely a Jewish problem... The people of Iran are very talented people. They're heirs to one of the world's great civilizations. But in 1979, they were hijacked by religious zealots -- religious zealots who imposed on them immediately a dark and brutal dictatorship. That year, the zealots drafted a constitution, a new one for Iran. It directed the revolutionary guards not only to protect Iran's borders, but also to fulfill the ideological mission of jihad. The regime's founder, Ayatollah Khomeini, exhorted his followers to 'export the revolution throughout the world.'

"America's founding document promises life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Iran's founding document pledges death, tyranny, and the pursuit of jihad. And as states are collapsing across the Middle East, Iran is charging into the void to do just that."

Israel's prime minister goes on to list Iran's "successes" in pursuit of jihad, all familiar to us, but never spelled out one after the other, connecting the dots.

And then Netanyahu warns us carefully:

"Don't be fooled. The battle between Iran and ISIS doesn't turn Iran into a friend of America.

"Iran and ISIS are competing for the crown of militant Islam. One calls itself the Islamic Republic. The other calls itself the Islamic State. Both want to impose a militant Islamic empire first on the region and then on the entire world. They just disagree among themselves who will be the ruler of that empire.

"In this deadly game of thrones, there's no place for America or for Israel, no peace for Christians, Jews or Muslims who don't share the Islamist medieval creed, no rights for women, no freedom for anyone.

"So when it comes to Iran and ISIS, the enemy of your enemy... is your enemy."

And these people want the atom bomb, and are determined to get it. Right now, Secretary of State Kerry is working to give it to them. He is naively negotiating with these savages, agreeing to terms that are unenforceable, conditions that cannot be verified, guarantees that cannot be confirmed, and that doesn't even matter, because in a mere few years, the entire agreement expires, and Iran is totally unrestricted and can do whatever it pleases. It's as if Obama wants Iran to have nuclear weapons.

Netanyahu points out that the only difference between the warring factions, "is that ISIS is armed with butcher knives, captured weapons and YouTube, whereas Iran could soon be armed with intercontinental ballistic missiles and nuclear bombs."

Speaking only of publicly available information (he was scolded for using secret intelligence, but made it clear everything he "revealed" was already on Google), "To defeat ISIS and let Iran get nuclear weapons would be to win the battle, but lose the war... that, my friends, is exactly what could happen, if the deal now being negotiated is accepted by Iran. That deal will not prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. It would all but guarantee that Iran gets those weapons, lots of them."

And he goes on to detail how all of Iran's nuke plants continue to exist, grow, operate and make enriched uranium. Inspectors can document violations -- but can't stop them. And like North Korea, Iran breaks the locks, takes out the cameras, and plays "hide and cheat," constantly. These aren't Boy Scouts -- they are villains. They've been caught twice with huge secret nuke plants -- not barrels of uranium, that inspectors didn't know existed. The chief IAEA inspector said, "If there's no undeclared installation today in Iran, it will be the first time in 20 years that it doesn't have one."

Netanyahu told us, in front of Congress: "Iran's Supreme Leader says Iran plans to have 190,000 centrifuges, not 6,000 or even the 19,000 that Iran has today, but 10 times that amount -- 190,000 centrifuges enriching uranium. With this massive capacity, Iran could make the fuel for an entire nuclear arsenal and this in a matter of weeks, once it makes that decision."

Did the "news" media report any of this to you? This is the important part of Bibi's speech. And there is nothing controversial about Israel in this. Iran is the controversy here. And our media -- now among our greatest enemies -- is a root problem for us. They are keeping you in the dark. Iran plans to make enough enriched uranium for an arsenal of nukes, not a bomb, they want to annihilate our greatest ally. We're their greatest enemy, and you had to read my report to find out. Hmmm.

Netanyahu's not done: " Now I want you to think about that. The foremost sponsor of global terrorism could be weeks away from having enough enriched uranium for an entire arsenal of nuclear weapons and this with full international legitimacy.

"And by the way, if Iran's Intercontinental Ballistic Missile program is not part of the deal, and so far, Iran refuses to even put it on the negotiating table. Well, Iran could have the means to deliver that nuclear arsenal to the far-reach corners of the Earth, including to every part of the United States... That's why this deal is so bad. It doesn't block Iran's path to the bomb; it paves Iran's path to the bomb."

And Mr. Obama is designing it with Mr. Kerry, who claim ignorance. Who knows, maybe they are. That's why Mr. Netanyahu came here  to speak directly to us.

Then the controversial part (according to our press) -- if Iran wants a good deal, stop behaving so badly, stop exporting terrorism, stop your path to nuclear weapons, stop your brutality at home and abroad, treat your woman like humans, endure sanctions while you behave so badly, Israel will always remain a staunch ally of the U.S., and we know we in Israel can count of you in America, but we cannot and will not allow this to occur no matter what, for the sake of the world. You can read it all online.






2- TWO REPORTS FROM THE WAY BACK MACHINE

a) Several weeks prior to Netanyahu's congressional speech

b) 2006 Page Nine report on Iran's development of an atomic bomb


The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:

Just three weeks earlier USA Today reported on Feb. 10, 2105: "President Obama said Monday that the time has come for Iran to decide whether to accept a nuclear deal, and he acknowledged 'very real differences' with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the negotiations."



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

The Uninvited Ombudsman has been pointing out for years* that Iran is laughing at us, openly and to our faces, and simply continuing to pursue nuclear weapons while the person currently in the White House rattles a sabre fecklessly. The "news" media reports the sabre rattling as if it means something. Critics say the reporters don't know better.

In other news, The National Review quotes Mohammed Ali Jafari, the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard saying, "The Americans have very clearly surrendered to Iran's might, and this is obvious in their behavior in the region and their negotiations." The quote accurately describes the entire situation. USA Today could not be reached for comment. Other "news" media apparently didn't get the memo.

In still other news, The National Review quoted Iran's President, Hassan Rouhani, saying "Centrifuges have been running and I promise the Iranian nation that centrifuges will never stop." Centrifuges are the devices needed to create fissionable uranium for atom bombs. Other "news" media apparently didn't get that memo either.

Backgrounder: Most naturally occurring uranium metal has an atomic weight of 238, but a tiny percentage of it is an isotope that weighs 235 (it has three less neutrons in its nucleus). The lighter portion is the part that can be made into a bomb, and Iran is separating this based on the extremely small difference in weight, by converting the metal to a gas, uranium tetrafluoride, and running it in high-speed gas centrifuges. High speed means something like 1,500 revolutions per second (90,000 RPM) which is Mach 2, depending on size.

Iran is believed to have as many as 100,000 of these devices spinning 24 hours a day (the numbers and locations are hotly disputed). Mr. Obama actually thinks Iran has to make some sort of decision about that. Everyone else knows they already have. And now back to your previously scheduled advertising.


* "Diplomats told the Associated Press that Iran is ready to consider complying, at least temporarily, with a U.N. Security Council demand that it freeze uranium enrichment, which can be used in developing atomic weapons," says AP reporter George Jahn, on Sep. 11, 2006...

Iran has been telling the Associated Press it may stop bomb production, which the AP dutifully reports, constantly. Meanwhile, inspectors are locked out, promises are made to gullible reporters instead of responsible authorities... Full report here: https://www.gunlaws.com/PageNine-15.htm (Page Nine No. 15, I'm up to No. 144)




3-WAYBACK MACHINE report on:

Al Gore's inconvenient Noble Prize


The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:


"Arctic ice could be gone in as little as seven years." -Al Gore, accepting the Nobel Prize in 2007.



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

http://www.express.co.uk/news/nature/548516/North-South-poles-not-melting-Dr-Benny-Peiser

Both poles are still there, and there is some evidence that north polar ice is growing, but Nobel Prizes are forever, so Al Gore is safe, but we'll keep watching of course.

Dr. Peiser's study that shows increases in north pole size cited above comes from a research institute whose stated purpose is to challenge global warming alarmism, dubious claims, economic demands and other recent climate extremism. It's a terrible job, but someone has to do it. Al Gore and his millions of followers certainly can't be left out on their own, seven years later.




4- Illegal immigration still running amok


The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:

Illegals at the border have dropped to the lowest point in years, reports The Arizona Republic. Major news outlets have all but forgotten this story, so it must not be happening.



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

The local newspaper reported that 3,100 illegal aliens had come across into Arizona, in a story, late last year. They didn't call them future democrat voters, as some critics claim. Actually, Border Patrol reports 479,371 apprehensions at the border for 2014, nearly a half million, or 39,947 per month on average, most of them in Texas. According to local experts, half a million people is a lot of mouths to feed.

It's unclear what happened to them all, or if they'll become future democrat voters as critics claim. Obama has jumped through many hoops to allow many illegals stay in the country, using a pen and a phone, in apparent violation of law. Critics question if he would do this if it were probable they would become republican voters. The Border Patrol generally estimates it catches one illegal for every two that attempt illegal entry.





5- Government meddles with menus, defies First Amendment


The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/25/us/fda-to-announce-sweeping-calorie-rules-for-restaurants.html?_r=0
WASHINGTON - The Food and Drug Administration announced sweeping rules on Tuesday that will require chain restaurants, movie theaters and pizza parlors across the country to post calorie counts on their menus. Health experts said the new requirements would help combat the country's obesity epidemic by showing Americans just how many calories lurk in their favorite foods.

“This is one of the most important public health nutrition policies ever to be passed nationally,” said Margo Wootan, director of nutrition policy at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. “Right now, you are totally guessing at what you are getting. This rule will change that.”

Menu labeling became law in 2010 as part of the Affordable Care Act, and the F.D.A. issued a proposal for how it should be put into effect the following year. But the final rules were delayed for three years, in part because of fierce opposition from pizza and movie theater chains. The rules were published in the Federal Register, a government journal, on Tuesday morning... <snip>



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

My position is not a popular one here, because I am against calorie counts in menus. First for aesthetic reason, but mainly for the way it is being foisted upon me and the public around me.

Sure, I might like to know what I'm getting at times, but first and foremost, people in government have no legitimate delegated authority to do this, so they can't legally require it.

They usurp power they were not given, and those requiring it should be imprisoned. Instead they will be praised by the unknowing, unwitting, and useful idiots. Some of you need to look in a mirror. You only think you cherish freedom.

This is also law making by unelected bureaucrats, a complete corruption of our political process. Congress cannot legitimately delegate its law making power to an agency, regardless of what courts have said or what powers they have granted unto themselves. The Constitution forbids it, and I for one demand it. They are beyond their authority, and have earned arrest and trial for malfeasance and violation of oath.

Finally, if my neighbors and I want to know calories counts badly enough, it would fall to the media and the public square to make this so plainly known that the restaurants that provided it would prosper, and others would wither and pass away, if things ran as they should.

That things do not run so is not a reason or excuse to compromise the integrity of our political system, and I would sooner live without calorie counts forced upon our printed menus than a government granting itself such power that a restaurant that fails to do so could be driven out of business by government gone wild.




6- Missing words often tell the story


The lamestream media told you:
The lamestream media told you:

"Salem, Ore. -- Gov. John Kitzhaber resigned office Friday amid allegations of criminal wrongdoing, almost exactly one month after being sworn in for an unprecedented fourth term. Secretary of State Kate Brown will replace him. His resignation is effective Wednesday, he said Friday in a letter... He appears to be the first Oregon governor to face an AG investigation..." Two other investigations are underway as well, involving 11 state agencies and at least 17 individuals...



The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:
The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

The entire Page One story failed to identify the party of the Governor, so appearing as it did in USA Today, that means he must have been a democrat. One quick check online and sure enough, yup he was a democrat. Why let the enormous humiliation and embarrassment of such disgrace be associated directly with the democrat party, when you can simply leave out the word.

The media still persists in referring to Michael Brown as "an unarmed black man shot by police" instead of the more accurate "a black man shot while attempting to steal a police officer's gun." The officer was exonerated of any wrong do whatsoever, and reports of Brown having his hands raised were completely discredited by the U.S. attorney general, who is black.






STARTERS AT THE END THIS TIME

My brief statement in Page Nine No. 143 about how to identify unconstitutional law was so popular I figure I should provide the entire research blurb I've compiled; go ahead and circulate it so more people are more aware, the country needs this:

"When is a law constitutional?"

"Believe nothing,
no matter where you read it
or who has said it, not even if I have said it,
unless it agrees with your own reason
and your own common sense."
--Buddha

"Just as it is the duty of all men to obey just laws,
so it is the duty of all men to disobey unjust laws."
-- Martin Luther King Jr.


"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law, and no courts are bound to enforce it."
-- 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256

From Supreme Court Gun Cases (Kopel, Halbrook, Korwin, Bloomfield Press, 2003):
"Miranda's basic principles are only tangential to the infringement issues continually arising over the right to keep arms and the right to bear arms, and Miranda is by no stretch a gun case itself per se. But it is in a special category of cases that is cited frequently in terms of the general rights involved in firearms rights. A reader who feels that the inclusion of this case goes too far afield of the Supreme Court Gun Cases theme (and case count) will be pleased to note that the following seven cases have not been included for that very reason:

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137  1803
“an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void.”

Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616  1886
“It is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachments thereon.”

Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425  1886
“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as though it had never been passed.”

Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438  1928
“Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding.” (Note: quoted from dissent.)

Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105  1943
“A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution.”
“a person cannot be compelled 'to purchase, through a license fee or a license tax, the privilege freely granted by the Constitution.'”

Staub v. Baxley, 355 U.S. 313  1958
“It is settled by a long line of recent decisions of this Court that an ordinance which, like this one, makes the peaceful enjoyment of freedoms which the Constitution guarantees contingent upon the uncontrolled will of an official-as by requiring a permit or license which may be granted or withheld in the discretion of such official-is an unconstitutional censorship or prior restraint upon the enjoyment of those freedoms.”

Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham Alabama, 394 U.S. 147  1969
“And our decisions have made clear that a person faced with such an unconstitutional licensing law may ignore it and engage with impunity in the exercise of the right of free expression for which the law purports to require a license.”

"It's probably a good idea to keep in mind that the axiom described in these cases-an unconstitutional law is void-has an important corollary. Even an unconstitutional law is the law, and stays in place with full force and effect, until it is declared unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, or until removed by the legislature. People are arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned under unconstitutional laws all the time. Some get off later. That can be summed up with a piece of street wisdom: The law means what the officer with the gun in your ear says it means."









////////


Missing words?

The same narrative controllers who insist on leaving out "Hussein" in Barack Hussein Obama, for fear it might have meaning, or upset the American public, have suppressed the middle name of the assassin of two New York City policemen:


He is being connected with black gangs, but not with muslim forces, despite the suppression of his true name. America is in a global jihad, and the people who control the narrative won't say so, but know it. (Propagandists controlling the narrative similarly show fealty to feminist radicals by using Hillary Rodman Clinton's middle name, to the exclusion of virtually all others.)

The jihad will be televised. As workplace violence. By "a few."











America is actually ranked only 9th on the scale of gun freedoms, according to The Worldwide Gun Owner's Guide, published by Bloomfield Press. Tiny Liechtenstein, Switzerland and other nations that hardly suffer from helatious mass atrocities are ahead of the United States, out of the 64 nations meticulously profiled in this marvelous book.

----:::----

----:::----

Only $20 for a 4-Pack so you can give 'em away!
 
That's just five bucks each!

Immediate delivery on Kindle, only $4.95!

Owning guns here is dangerous,

without this:

 
Only $24.95 +S&H

----:::----

STILL A FEW LEFT!

You will  devour  this book when you finally decide
to break down and get one.

He's working on a sequel,
read the first while you can still get one.



TEMPUS FUGIT
by Lawrence Lee Rowe
Only $20, hardcover
 

Summary: Washington, Jefferson and Franklin find themselves inexplicably transported to the future (our time), and explore the country they launched two centuries earlier. I loved it. A fascinating examination of the Founders’ original values and hopes, contrasted beautifully with where we are today. Deeply insightful, amazing confrontations, a true masterpiece.

Everyone who reads this loves it.

THE FOUNDERS PACKAGE
"The Books That Gave America It's Start"

This is what the Founding Fathers read... and wrote.

Now you can get America's most essential books --
Available from Bloomfield Press as an economical one-price set!

Just a few easy clicks for a superb addition to your library
Complete 11 book set, only $71.95 +S&H

 

Read all about it

BE SMART ABOUT IT:


The Texas Gun Owner's Guide
https://www.gunlaws.com/tgog.htm

Texas gun laws have changed -- a lot.

New hotel rules; Guns-in-vehicles laws changed; "Inadvertent Display Law";
School Marshal program explained; New knife laws; BB and air-gun laws;
Preemption and school grounds; "Reveal and relinquish your gun" law;
"Defensive Display" law; CHL training has been overhauled...

If you have this book without the flag colors and red emblem on the cover you're out-of date.

Texas DPS is no longer approving training materials, and they
no longer provide the type of support they did when the CHL program started.

The list of laws they give out is PARTIAL -- this book has them all (and describes them).
Can't get your calls and emails answered at HQ? This book answers your questions.
The few bucks you spend here is cheaper (and better!) than a lawyer later.

In spots the DPS website is out of date -- this book is 100% current.

Don't take chances with your freedom --
Get The Texas Gun Owner's Guide.
Only $14.95 +S&H

Trainers -- get this for your students!
Don't teach class without it.

Get two copies with free shipping! Save $5!
Only $29.90!
 
One for you, one for a friend or a gift.


All the Texas gun laws are described in PLAIN ENGLISH,
with a copy of the actual statutes in the back of every book.

Look inside:
https://www.gunlaws.com/TGOG_Contents.htm

STORE OWNERS, CHL TRAINERS:
40% wholesale discount by the half dozen!
PLUS -- one free copy per dozen through Jan. 30, 2015!
Just Call for wholesale orders: 1-800-279-7654. Don't delay.
You don't have to be in business to buy at wholesale for friends and family (minimum six copies).


https://www.gunlaws.com/tgog.htm
"If you knew all your rights you might demand them."

Makes a great holiday gift for someone you know.
Ask for an autograph in the Comments box on the order form.

"It doesn't make sense to own a gun and not know the rules."

"If you knew all your rights you might demand them."

The Texas Gun Owner's Guide, only $14.95
https://www.gunlaws.com/tgog.htm
 

Get two copies with free shipping! Save $5!
Only $29.90!
 
One for you, one for a friend or a gift.

 
Only $14.95 (+S&H)

Get two copies with free shipping! Save $5!
Only $29.90!
 
One for you, one for a friend or a gift.

Women, read this.