has selected a Jamaican/Indian woman to join him on the Democrat's
presidential ticket. Turning a blind eye to pleas for a Black woman as a
running mate, and ignoring the constitutional requirement in Article II for
a natural born Citizen (two American parents at the time of birth
when born on U.S. soil), Biden has picked hard left Kamala Harris, an
anti-gun lawyer with no American parent -- yielding a divided loyalty,
split allegiance and another constitutional mess. The reaction from Blacks,
Jamaicans, Indians, and diversity advocates is pouring
that Joe Biden has announced his VP pick, the news cycle will harp on it
non-stop, cancelling out most other news.
That's not news, that's campaigning, and unethical. Biden
will say little. He can't. This is widely
you hear the name (her woman-of-color name, formerly colored-woman name,
that's already a done deal), change the channel to cartoons, you'll learn
an equal amount. The speeches are written, arguments prepared, vote for him
or the other guy, for reasons A, B and C, absolutely zero new news is
coming, and it won't change your mind. Riots or riot suppression, that's
what you get. You already know what the Democrats are about, and the
Republicans. What you don't know is their gun plans. Coming
first -- simple questions for kids returning to
Q: Do you know
where the bubbles in soda come from, or what they're made
A: CO2, carbon
Q: Do you feel
safer knowing you're releasing the enemy of Earth into the atmosphere?
("Earth" is always capitalized except when you mean
A: Ask your teachers
about that, where the bubbles came from, how they get in the cans, and what
1. What Is
a "natural born Citizen"
Was it ever defined?
What was/is the definition?
Did the Founding Fathers know
Did they just throw that in without knowing what they were
Is there a reason they used it? What was the
Can the Constitution be
changed without an Amendment?
(You know the answer to that)
Why do people who ask get
called dirty names?
I know I
promised to write up the Democrats gun-ban bill, HR 5717, but this has to
the fuss over Article II, 14A, “citizen,” "birthright citizen,"
and “natural born Citizen”
is getting out of hand.
I have the gun-ban bill
done, but questions are flooding in to me. Have to answer all at
This first. Then I have co-written articles about the BLM
but the mess media won't let up on this
Birther Is an “N”
It’s almost as bad as calling
someone “a racist.”
Typically, the people who charge racism are the racists,
ever notice that?
This is a way to avoid a discussion, to
write off a person or topic
as unworthy of debate.
Using a curse word to avoid using your brain is
dishonest. It avoids knowledge, facts or logic.
Cursing you out is a cheap shot, a way to
There is nothing “birther”
about the U.S. Constitution, or Article
II, or its requirement for the U.S. President to be not just a citizen but
born Citizen” spelled that way in Article II with no hyphen and one
Our Founding Fathers (yes, Fathers) put
the nbC requirement in the
Constitution for a reason, a critically important reason, and modern
denigrate it, whitewash it, pretend it doesn’t exist or doesn’t
mean what it
really means are really about destroying America. Yes, it is that
Anyone who says “birther!” about this is worse than someone who
shouts the N
word, because the "N" word is just racism. This is about the survival of
A lot of lies and distortions are being
used to attack the
Constitution right now. Leftists and unfortunately Democrats are the main
culprits (but not the only ones). The whole concept of a natural born Citizen, or nbC is
under attack, along with
infringement of your right to arms and more. Some of these principles you
they’re easy. NOTE: Be sure you're registered to vote, do
1. The Constitution can
only be changed by Amendment. You know this. It
cannot be changed by a statute from Congress. News
media has been insisting otherwise, shame on them, they abandoned ethics
ago. It cannot be changed by a Supreme Court decision (though some
reinterpret it, sometimes badly).
2. The Constitution does
not define “natural born Citizen”
and while that’s true, anyone saying that seeks to deceive you,
it’s a "tell," a dead giveaway.
define virtually any of its
terms. You know that too:
weights and measures; post roads, arms, infringed, the people, privileges,
immunities, due process of law, free speech. the press, houses, papers,
religion, assemble, none of it is defined. If you see “But the
define natural-born citizen!” you know you’re dealing with an
The Founders warned, when a question of
definition arises, go back
to the original meaning at the time the Constitution was written and use
3. Article II has never
been amended. The process for amending the Constitution
is in Article V. It has
never been used to change Article II. The President must be a natural born
Citizen, or the Constitution is violated, abrogated.
also know this -- The
Founders used language carefully and with precision. They did not just
things down without thought. This is
less widely known, and is now being obfuscated (obscured, blurred,
muddied, twisted): “natural born Citizen” was defined and well
known when the Constitution
was written. The definition of nbC, the only definition existing at the
was in a book Ben Franklin brought to the Constitutional Convention in
Philadelphia, a process described in detail below.
A natural born Citizen is a person born on
U.S. soil, to two U.S. citizens
at the time of birth. There is no other way to gain this quality.
5.Simply becoming a
by being born here is different. “Birthright citizenship”
is different. “Naturalization”
is different. What the 14th Amendment accomplished is different. The
Court Ark case did not affect nbC or Article II. All
things are being brought up in a vain attempt to suggest the conditions of
Article II have been amended, which is false. The 14th Amendment
mention Article II, or natural born citizenship, it introduces birthright
citizenship, and important new concept. Same for the important Ark
case. The requirements for the presidency remain
As a side note, the U.S. military allows
expecting couples to take
a leave of absence so they can come stateside to have their baby, to
their child’s nbC birthright and remain eligible to be President,
should that ever
come to pass. Being born overseas, even to U.S. citizen parents in
would remove that important nbC characteristic.
Yes, there are all sorts of arguments to
the contrary. I’ve
studied them all. I watched the full congressional challenge to McCain on
grounds, and through contorted logic decide the Panama Canal Zone was U.S.
so he qualified as nbC, with both Obama and Hillary on the panel (did you
that? it’s in the Federal Register, I have a copy). Funny, the
hearing for the
other candidate was never held, I’ve never been able to determine
how, but I
suspect I know why.
The recent opposition piece in ReasonMagazine Online that folks keep
sending me was written by my friend and colleague, scholar Eugene Volokh,
responses to an email chat we’ve been having. When he says
“some people have
been saying...” that’s me, covers our talks online. He
didn’t like my original memo
about Kamala’s lack of eligibility. We differ, and he took to Reason to make his case, since he
not get around my arguments and documentation from the Founding era.
Reason’s editor for a
reply, no response yet. (The USA
and NY Times articles are gas;
CRS paper was done at a time (2011) and for a reason that undermines its
logic and holes, can’t go into everything here.)
Kamala Harris is clearly not eligible.
Article II distinguishes
between a citizen and a natural born Citizen, right in its
wording for good reason, and only the latter is eligible. She is not by
definition. I posted the letter from John Jay, our first Chief Justice of
Supreme Court to George Washington, saying make sure only a natural born
Citizen can become Commander in Chief, to which George replied good idea. It’s a definition, not a
I did the legwork, I did not make this up
or get it wrong. The
Founders were serious, and for good reason. It's not about simply being
here, as so many people say or wish was the case (CNN! OMG), it's about
putting a 100%
American in the office and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces. (In
modern days this includes the nuclear launch codes.)
It’s easy to gain citizenship, in a
number of ways. A natural born
Citizen happens in only one way, born on U.S. soil to two citizen parents
the time of birth, no foreign component at all. The military even
to expectant parents so they can come here to give birth and preserve that
Now we have an Indian American, and
Jamaican American running, not
even an African American, despite "news" media calling her Black
(Biden has stiffed the Blacks -- they don't even realize it). How about
CBS even has a headline calling her an African American! Of all the absurd
journalism! I saw a report, Indians are furious about this! When did
just learned that a 1962 amendment to the Constitution of
Jamaica claims anyone with a Jamaican father is a Jamaican citizen, so
born in 1964 has dual citizenship. How do you suppose this affects her
allegiance? Look for yourself, again, I don’t invent
If all that’s
required is birth in America,
as Marco Rubio claims, then how is Cruz eligible, born abroad?
If birthplace (jus soli) sets the standard, then why
Cruz a Canadian? (He was, relinquished citizenship there in 2014.)
If all that’s
required is one citizen parent,
as Ted Cruz claims, then how is Rubio eligible, with none?
If parentage (jus sanguinis) sets the standard, then why isn't Rubio
(Cuban law claims he is, both parents were Cuban.)
If all that’s required is birth on this land, then what’s to
stop North Korean
dictators or Iranian mullahs from sending a couple here to drop a baby,
it elsewhere, then come back for the required 14 years and offer it up for
president? Don’t you think the Founders considered such a scenario?
exactly that with international intrigues from the monarchies in Europe.
is exactly why they put the natural born Citizen requirement in Article II.
only definition of the term,
from the Founding era, is in the book Congress had at the time, which Ben
Franklin had sent over to him from Europe and brought to the convention
de Vattel’s Law of Nations, famous and widely used, Franklin
copies, kept one, put one in a library, brought one to the Congress, which
said they were using.)
defines it as two citizen parents and birth on U.S. soil. Why such arduous
debate today. Why the enthusiasm to let foreigners run for our presidency?
That answer is ugly. Look further
you’ve the stomach for it.
Cruz and Rubio, who are good folks but unfortunately ineligible. People no
longer give a crap about the Constitution. We drown in infringements. So
people were involved in misprision of treason that to recognize it now,
that’s simply an intolerable act.
P.P.S. Biden shafted the Blacks -- he
didn't give them a Black,
er, African American... she's Indian, or Jamaican. An Indian American! I
report, the Indians are furious about it. Haven't heard from Jamaicans
mon. Mess media has avoided this obvious oversight. They're calling her
anyway, CBS has a headline calling her African American! Doesn't even look
black. Mulatto I believe would be the correct term. Colored woman, now
woman of color, the preposition "of" assuages the racism for leftist
racists, Emperors clothes, you know... it’s a truth-affronting
ethics in media any longer. CNN pundits simply talk about African
when there is none.
Bloomfield Press: Still serving your
needs after more than three decades:
The President tore
a new one for the education system
at his brilliant
Mount Rushmore speech for Independence Day.
People who read
Page Nine are well aware of the near total
takeover of our
government school system
by the forces of
the Marxist/socialism/communism hordes.
Now the President,
fighting Democrats tooth and nail,
is insisting that
students go back into these virulent pestholes
in the Fall
semester for... what, exactly? An education?
a twisted distortion of what America is?
A hatred of America
that resembles nothing of our fine land?
Man smells a rat.
"It don't make no
sense, no how."
(Triple negative is
word-for-word, at Mt. Rushmore:
there is a new far-left fascism that demands absolute allegiance. If you do
speak its language, perform its rituals, recite its mantras, and follow
commandments, then you will be censored, banished, blacklisted, persecuted,
of society and nature, our children are taught in school to hate their own
country, and to believe that the men and women who built it were not
but that were villains. The radical view of American history is a web of
all perspective is removed, every virtue is obscured, every motive is
every fact is distorted, and every flaw is magnified until the history is
purged and the record is disfigured beyond all
--Donal J. Trump,
Did you know
Schools led by the
are teaching hatred
If you're a person
of no color (aka "white people")
you're an oppressor
and should hate yourself.
Get the school
textbooks. Read about our history.
Where are YOU
Total fun, and
WORLDWIDE GUN OWNER'S GUIDE
A 64-nation guide to the world's gun
laws! See their laws, local
prices, who can bear arms, what you can possess (military ordnance in
some places!), clubs and contacts -- America is not alone in the
struggle to protect and enjoy the right to arms! Complete chart of gun
freedom for every nation. Read
Illustrated, with national rankings
Every nation has gun
ranges, gun stores, gun rights.
GO LOOK, that's free:
If you appreciate Alan Korwin’s
efforts, here’s a great way to support his work, and enjoy
his best-selling national titles, at one
More proof Americans (not you of course) are stupider than
And Earth, by the way, takes a capital letter, it is not earth
unless you mean
Start watching mess media with your eyes open, you'll see
Envirowackos (and mess media) consistently misspell our planet,
unlike mars or
No editing, no ombudsman, no ethics, no worries. What, me
Don't worry. MAD magazine went belly
In the ongoing effort to dumb down the public, merchandise
sales efforts now include impossible math, to an electorate that can't add,
from a school system that doesn't teach them how. People who I won't name
(not you honey, I swear) believe "Buy one get one for 50% off!" is a half
price sale. It's a 25% discount, and it gets you to spend more. Do the
math. Oh, that's right, most people can't. Hence the
By now you have probably gotten wise to the scam of raising
prices, then offering a discount, often to above the original price. That's
illegal, but just like with gun law, you don't need law, you need law
enforcement, and there is none. Look at Portland. Why aren't those people
arrested, or worse? Democrats are proposing eliminating law enforcement,
and have convinced people to vote for that. I say,